"Logic and rationality are no match for paranoia and romance."

Did we truly go to the moon??
Do the math:
We've all heard for decades now how powerful satellites cameras are, that they can read newsprint from 50 miles up. Assuming the worst case scenario: that there are zero of such satellites revolving the moon, and that the nearest of these satellites is never within 250,000 miles from the lunar surface. The math is straight forward grade one:
typical newsprint is about 1/10" high;
250,000/50 = 5,000. 5,000 X 1/10" = 500 inches.

Therefore, the very same satellite camera that can read newsprint on earth can
easily see a 500 inch (42 ft) object on the moon. Those buggies churned up the lunar soil for miles and miles. That would appear in the lense as clear as day
with the zoom off!! But nope, no photos! Tho this in itself doesn't prove anything, don't you smell the cover up?? If not, then maybe you need a shrink??
If you consider that the earth has an atmosphere for the cameras to contend with, snapping a clear (undisputable) shot of mile-wide tire tracks on the moon are even more convincing.

BTW...
Don't you think that someone back then would have had the brains to get one of the astro-nUts to moon write the word "HELLO" or just "HI" or "NA" (Neil Armstrong) with one of those so called moon buggies?? Come on! Don't give me this bs line that their missions were too time-sensitive when the nuts wasted gobs of time will their constant silly horseplay and farting around anyway. It would take all of five minutes on the outside to write a few mile-big letters in the sand yet it would convince the entire world we were there. This would guaranteed be one of
the mission objectives. True it wouldn't prove humans were there, but it would at least prove machines were there.

Steve

Email